Friday, March 25, 2005

Fox vs Henhouse precedent

BILLINGSGATE JOURNAL (Dateline San Diego)

Exclusive Report: Let me ask you some questions. Where are the screaming liberal bats who passionately insist that a woman is not a husband's chattel when Terri Schiavo needs them? Why isn't there a support group for women whose husbands want to pull the plug on them?

BULLETIN: The above diatribe has been superceded by news that it is now politically incorrect to say, "Easter Bunny." The little rabbit must now be called something completely free from religious connotations, like "Garden Bunny."

Back to questions: Because liberals have agreed to selectively treat the pronouncements of former ambulance chasers to be considered the word of God, would these same "humanists" be upset if Judge Greer ordered that Ms. Schiavo be shot by firing squad at her husband's request because it is more humane than starving her to death?

When Judge Greer cited the infamous landmark, "Fox vs Henhouse" ruling of 1897 that was recently upheld by the Supreme Court it left the parents of Terri Schiavo no legal recourse. Interestingly enough, when the fox, who was the plaintiff in this case, was allowed back in the henhouse to guard the chickens, he and his devious attorneys celebrated by having a chicken dinner. When even the President, Congress and the Governor of Florida, Jeb Bush, could not intercede in her behalf, it makes one wonder why criminals on death row have more rights to live than this innocent woman.

BULLETIN: In two days it will be Garden Sunday. Please put out your garden eggs for the children without disturbing your bunny's rights.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home